AM-MD.com News

Mayfair investment bank teams up with IVG to buy Swiss Re Tower

February 2nd, 2007

A Mayfair-based niche investment bank has intervened in the 600 million purchase of Londons Swiss Re Tower, better known as the Gherkin.

The move by Evans Randall is bound to intensify speculation, which first surfaced last spring, that the privately owned bank is amassing a portfolio of landmark buildings that could soon be listed on the stock market.

The 180m (590ft) building at 30 St Mary Axe is set to be the UKs most expensive office block after its owners, Swiss Re, secured a deal with IVG Asticus, the German investment firm, in December.

But Evans Randall is poised to take a half share in the 40- storey skyscraper after setting up a joint venture with IVG.

Evans Randall, founded and run by chairman Mike Evans, started buying into commercial property just over two years ago but in the past 18 months has snapped up 2 billion of property, including trophy City offices.

The banks recent acquisitions include HBOSs head-quarters in Old Broad Street for 197 million and ABN Amros new head offices on Bishopsgate, next to Spitalfields, which it bought for 194 million. Evans Randall also paid 200 million for the Financial Services Authority building at North Colonnade in Canary Wharf.

The Gherkin, designed by Lord Foster of Thames Bank, and opened in April 2004 to widespread critical acclaim, is the ultimate in landmark acquisitions.

The building is also occupied by an array of reliable and high-profile tenants, including Swiss Re, which has the 15 bottom floors. It is thought that the insurer is taking a 25-year lease on the building. Other tenants include Allianz, the German insurer and Coutts, the private bank.

Evans Randall usually underwrites each deal itself with high levels of gearing then sells equity stakes to a network of wealthy investors.

Selling the Swiss Re Tower at 600 million represents a yield of about 4.75 per cent, reflecting the strength of investor demand for City offices.

The highest price to date for a single office building is the 520million paid last January for CityPoint, a 36-storey tower on Ropemaker Street, at a yield of 5.8 per cent.

Evans Randall and IVG are being advised by CB Richard Ellis and Knight Frank.

Balfour Beatty hails its biggest US buy

February 2nd, 2007

Balfour Beatty, Britains biggest construction company, has paid $362 million (184 million) for Centex Construction, its largest buy in the US to date.

America will account for a quarter of Balfour Beattys revenues, up from 10 per cent last year, and new clients will include the US Government, Disney, the leisure group, and Marriott, the hotelier.

Ian Tyler, the chief executive of Balfour, said that the deal also brought a platform to bid for what could be a wave of Public Private Partnership deals for building hospitals and schools in the US. Balfours existing US business generated about $1 billion of revenue last year, largely from road engineering and repairing railway track. The company had a building planning arm, but Centex provides an on-the-ground construction division that the group had lacked to attack the US market. Mr Tyler said: I am excited, as this genuinely achieves critical mass in the US at a demonstrably good price.

Centex comes with cash balances exceeding $200 million, meaning that Balfours net payment is only $162 million. Balfour is to pay Centexs parent company, Centex Corporation, $5 million a year to gain extra tax benefits. Centex comes with an order book worth $5.6 billion. Operating profit for the nine months to December 31 was $27.5 million, on $1.65 billion of revenue.

For its year to 31 March, Centex made profit of $26.8 million on revenues of $1.61 billion. Taking into account Centexs cash and assuming that full-year profits reach $35 million to $40 million, Balfour seems to have paid only just over four times earnings, against an industry average of about six times. Balfour sharesrose 9.3 per cent.

Americas best and worst housing markets

February 2nd, 2007

Talk about being in the right place at the right time.

While speculators and flippers in places such as Boston and San Diego are running for cover, in other parts of the country they are basking in robust residential sales. Third-quarter median home prices last year climbed 14.6 percent in Seattle, Wash.; 14.3 percent in El Paso, Texas; and 12.3 percent in Portland, Ore.

They also increased by roughly 5 percent in Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, Calif.; Austin, Texas; Jacksonville, Fla.; and Charlotte, N.C., over the year before, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Prices also jumped along the Gulf Coast, a good sign for Post-Katrina economic recovery efforts. Median home prices increased by 15.5 percent in Gulfport-Biloxi, Miss.; 14.1 percent in Baton Rouge, La.; and 7.6 percent in New Orleans, La.

Price figures are based on total metropolitan areas as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget. So, while the New York City metro area grew at a solid, but not blockbuster, rate of 3.6 percent, officials from New Yorks Finance Department say the five boroughs grew at 19 percent in 2006 twice the 2005 figure with prices in Brooklyn and the Bronx swelling 27.6 percent from the previous year.

In the rest of the country, median home prices on average dropped 1.2 percent. The most affected area was the Northeast, where median home prices plunged 4.8 percent over the last year.

Those homeowners would be better off heading west where realtors expect prices to continue to rise.

There are still plenty of people out there looking to buy homes, our local economy is holding strong and there are a lot of people moving into the city, says Kristine Losh, a broker with Ewing & Clark. Geographically, Seattle is long and thin and surrounded by water. Theres not much room, so youve got a lot of people trying to get the same small amount of land.

Cities showing gains exhibited high job growth and positive net migration figures. They were also areas in which home affordability remained close to national averages through the boom, making them less prone to the corrections and adjustments seen in overheated markets.

Cities most affected by the downturn were old-line industrial markets such as Detroit or Lansing, where local economies are suffering the effects of mass layoffs in the auto industry.

In the Northeast, the number of jobs created last year grew only 0.8 percent, according to the New England Economic Partnership (NEEP), versus the 1.3 percent national growth rate. If that’s not bad enough, NEEPs projections for increases in gross regional product and per capita income also lag significantly behind national averages.

As a result, people are leaving the area. The latest United States Census net migration figures indicate that 4.6 percent more people left the region than entered it last year. The regional real estate market also experienced a 4.8 percent drop in median prices. On the flipside, the Souths economic conditions lead to the nations best migration rate (3.4 percent) and subsequently, at -.1 percent, the nations best median home price growth figures.

From 2004 to 2005, median homes prices in most of the cities that are now resisting downturn, such as Austin and Charlotte, grew at slower rates than the national average.

This made them less susceptible to the sudden swings of a high-flying, highly speculative market such as Miami. In this area, median home price exploded from $232,000 in 2003, to $391,000 at the end of 2005, driven by a market in which builders couldnt keep pace with demand. Miamis real estate market has since corrected, moving down 5.6 percent from its peak.

In the highest growth markets, there were a lot of folks who panicked when they saw prices going up by 8, 10 or 12 percent a year and rushed to buy in, says Kermit Baker, a senior research fellow at Harvard Universitys Joint Center for Housing Studies.

Once prices started to fall [in high growth markets], speculators got an itchy trigger finger because prices went up so high that it was very difficult to buy; affordability had gotten out of hand and people worried that if they waited six to eight months to sell, theyd be left holding the bag. The result is a short-term adjustment.

Steadier, more tempered growth translates into a stable real estate conditions because affordability remains in line with local economic conditions.

In markets with sharp transitions, there was a lot of speculative, short-run buying says Lawrence Yun, a senior economist with the National Association of Realtors. In places like Texas or North Carolina, home prices are affordable and there is a good job creating the environment. In Seattle, the job market is strong and while home prices are above the national average, they are affordable by West Coast standards.

Whats more, when home values grow too quickly, builders rush to keep up and when the party is over, construction slows and there is excess inventory. For example, this week the nations largest home builder, D.R. Horton, reported a 60 percent quarterly drop in earnings.

Add to the mix speculators anxious to dump property and the result is a jump in residential vacancy rates. Since the end of 2005, when the housing bubble began to pop, nationwide vacancy rates have jumped to 2.5 percent, a nearly 50 percent increase from the 10-year average. Higher vacancy rates give buyers leverage in negotiating price because sellers have excess supply.

Despite the numbers, some in sluggish areas remain hopeful.

In cities such as Boston, where median sales prices were beaten down 4.3 percent from the 2005 peak of $431,000, realtors say the market is still strong.

The biggest difference from 2004 and 2005 is that sellers are willing to negotiate on their prices bidding wars arent taking place, says David Green, a broker at Otis & Ahearn. The bottom line is, if you price your home right, it will move; you would not see that happening in a downward market.

Economists are similarly optimistic for the coming year.

Theres no urgency right now because people think that if they wait six months, they can get a cheaper price, says Baker. When they think the market has bottomed out, theyll buy back in. 2007 Forbes.com

Next Page »

AM-MD.com News © 2006-2007