AM-MD.com News

Economic Calendar: January 22-January 26

February 2nd, 2007

This column was originally published on RealMoney on Jan. 24 at 11:12 a.m. EST. It’s being republished as a bonus for TheStreet.com readers. For more information about subscribing to RealMoney, please click here.

The bear case for Level 3 (LVLT) has morphed from “bad balance sheet” to “dilutive” equity issuance.

That’s fabulous. Anytime the bears switch their thesis on the fly, you know they are being rousted and roasted.

Level 3 is going to give everybody equity for this crummy debt, as it told us Tuesday, until they’re satisfied that cash flow will be positive by the end of 2007. That’s why the dilution is irrelevant. That’s why you should cheer when the bears chant, “don’t buy it for dilution.”

The key to this story is simple: If Level 3 can solve the balance sheet, it will be in position to make it big in broadband. It’s binary: get cash-flow positive, you win; stay cash-flow positive you lose.

Dilution is a positive, not a negative.

Take that, bears!

Random musings: This AT&T (T) call is so bullish that it’s taking up the cable companies, too! It’s the conference call to be on, as Corning (GLW) was before it. … I’ve found your new favorite tool: TheStreet.com Ratings Screener. Use it to find exactly the stock you’re looking for — c’mon, I know you resolved that this is the year you get more involved in stocks. This is the easiest way yet to make sense of a universe of more than 6,000 names. It’s all here, sorted by market cap, rating and more.

Restaurants Fall Short on New Yardstick

February 2nd, 2007

This column was originally published on RealMoney on Jan. 31 at 1 p.m. EST. It’s being republished as a bonus for TheStreet.com readers. For more information about subscribing to RealMoney, please click here.

One thing that is tough on so many traders is the issue of trading stocks around earnings. Here’s the problem: Many stocks act calmly and rationally for about 10 or 11 weeks out of every quarter. But they start acting nutty right around the time when earnings numbers are announced. Why is that? Because traders are, for lack of a better way to say it, elbowing each other as they try to put their chips on the table. They’re buying because they are optimistic that the numbers will be good or selling because they are pessimistic the numbers will be bad.

There are different intensities of optimism and pessimism, and the level of intensity dictates actions. If you are pessimistic, are you selling stock that you own, or are you actually shorting stock that you don’t own? If you are optimistic, are you taking a new long position or just holding stock you already own? Or are you actually adding to an existing position to maximize your profit from the pending good news?

The way you treat trading around earnings is uniquely yours — but your approach should be defined by your time frame and your cost basis. If you have a long time horizon (measured in years), then you must necessarily hold positions over earnings. You’ve done your homework, and you know the company. The earnings release is simply confirmation of something you already know. You own a solid company, and it’s time to find out how your little superstar did over the past three months.

But if you have a shorter time horizon, measured by days and weeks — or perhaps months — then you tend to treat earnings differently. You are trading the volatility created by the jostling of traders. In that case, you are focusing more on risk management than the company’s fundamentals. You care more about how much profit you currently have in the trade and how big you are. Do you need to lighten up a bit to reduce your exposure, or do you need to take another nibble?

Again, these are all questions that you must answer yourself. But failure to ask these questions means that you aren’t really trading according to an established methodology or market approach. Instead, you’re just trading without a defined frame of reference. I think a more defined market approach keeps us out of trouble during those periods when the market goes a little nuts. A defined approach enables us to capitalize on what the market is doing rather than experience an emotional reaction to it. But then, that’s just me.

Let’s take a look at some reader requests.

Celgene (CELG) is resting right on the same support level that has propped the stock up since November. This looks like a top to me — at least, if the stock falls down below last week’s intraday low. I’d keep a stop down around $52, and I’d be a buyer if the bulls can gather enough strength to push the stock back up above the 50-day moving average.

Strong demand for J. Crew (JCG) at $36 is putting a limit on the decline that began last November. I love the company, but I’d sure sell the stock if it falls below $36. If that occurs, we could see a fall to $32 before the next level of support comes into play.

Level 3 Communications (LVLT) is above the 50-day moving average and continues to move higher in a choppy uptrend. This support trend line is right at the middle Bollinger Band. Given the volatility of the stock, I think you’ve got to give it room to move a bit, so I’d try keeping a stop just below $5.75.

Matrix Service (MTRX) has had quite a run over the past couple of years. The stock had been running higher in a steady channel until last October. That’s when it broke through the ceiling. Since then, that same trend line has defined buying pressure rather than selling pressure. That’s the type of thing that strong stocks do. I’d keep a stop right below the support line. But until that stop is hit, I’d just stay long and enjoy the ride.

OpenWave (OPWV) has been bouncing along support around $8.30 since late October. The stock is starting to establish a series of higher highs and lows, but the real support remains at about $8.30. I’d still be a buyer on pullbacks.

Be careful out there.

Please note that due to factors including low market capitalization and/or insufficient public float, we consider Matrix Service to be a small-cap stock. You should be aware that such stocks are subject to more risk than stocks of larger companies, including greater volatility, lower liquidity and less publicly available information, and that postings such as this one can have an effect on their stock prices.

Bet With the Rich on High-End Retail

February 2nd, 2007

COMPANY SYMBOL SPLIT ANNOUNCE RECORD DATE PAY DATE
Stage Stores, Inc. SSI 3 for 2 1/9/2007 1/18/2007 1/31/2007
Lundin Mining LMC 3 for 1 1/22/2007 2/5/2007 2/8/2007
Medical Action Industries Inc. MDCI 3 for 2 1/9/2007 1/23/2007 2/8/2007
ZOLL Medical ZOLL 2 for 1 1/25/2007 n/a 2/12/2007
Selective Insurance Group SIGI 2 for 1 1/30/2007 2/13/2007 2/20/2007
Preferred Bank of Los Angeles PFBC 3 for 2 1/25/2007 2/5/2007 2/20/2007
Trimble Navigation Ltd. TRMB 2 for 1 1/25/2007 2/8/2007 2/22/2007
MarkWest Energy Partners MWE 2 for 1 1/25/2007 2/22/2007 2/28/2007
Jacobs Engineering Group JEC 2 for 1 1/26/2007 2/15/2007 3/15/2007
Harsco Corp. HSC 2 for 1 1/23/2007 2/28/2007 3/27/2007
Amphenol Corp. APH 2 for 1 1/17/2007 3/16/2007 3/30/2007
Source: The Online Investor

Next Page »

AM-MD.com News © 2006-2007